Fundamentos da Regulação da Privacidade e Proteção de Dados Pessoais - Ed. 2020

Bibliografia

Entre no Jusbrasil para imprimir o conteúdo do Jusbrasil

Acesse: https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/cadastro

ABELSON, Harold; ANDERSON, Ross; BELLOVIN, Steven M.; et al. Keys under doormats: mandating insecurity by requiring government access to all data and communications. Journal of Cybersecurity, v. 1, n. 1, p. 69-79, 2015.

ACQUISTI, Alessandro. Nudging privacy: the behavioral economics of personal information. IEEE security & privacy, v. 7, n. 6, 2009. Disponível em: < http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5370707/> .

ACQUISTI, Alessandro; BRANDIMARTE, Laura; LOEWENSTEIN, George. Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science, v. 347, n. 6221, p. 509-514, 2015.

ACQUISTI, Alessandro; GROSSKLAGS, Jens. Privacy attitudes and privacy behavior. In: Economics of information security. [s.l.]: Springer, p. 165-178, 2004. Disponível em: < http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/1-4020-8090-5_13.pdf> .

ACQUISTI, Alessandro; GROSSKLAGS, Jens. What can behavioral economics teach us about privacy. Digital Privacy: theory, technologies and practices, v. 18, p. 363-377, 2007.

ACQUISTI, Alessandro; JOHN, Leslie K.; LOEWENSTEIN, George. What is privacy worth? The Journal of Legal Studies, v. 42, n. 2, p. 249-274, 2013.

ACQUISTI, Alessandro; TAYLOR, Curtis R.; WAGMAN, Liad. The economics of privacy. 2016. Disponível em: < https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2580411> .

AD-ID. Ad-ID Overview & Glossary of Terms. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 19 fev. 2019.

ALLEN, Anita L. Privacy law and society. [s.l.]: West Group, 2007.

ALMEIDA, Débora Rezende. Representação além das eleições: repensando as fronteiras entre Estado e sociedade. Jundiaí: Paco Editorial, 2015.

APEC. APEC Privacy Framework. Disponível em: < http://publications.apec.org/Publications/2005/12/APEC-Privacy-Framework> . Acesso em: 3 mar. 2019.

ARBIX, Daniel do Amaral. Resolução online de controvérsias. São Paulo: Intelecto, 2017.

ARGENTINA. Ministério de Justicia y Derechos Humanos. Proteccion De Los Datos. Disponível em: < http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/70000-74999/70368/norma.htm> . Acesso em: 18 fev. 2019.

ASSANGE, Julian. Cypherpunks: liberdade e o futuro da internet. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial, 2015.

AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT. Privacy Act 1988. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 3 mar. 2019.

AXELROD, Robert. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books, 1984.

AYENSON, M.; WAMBACH, D. J.; SOLTANI, A.; et al. Behavioral advertising: the offer you cannot refuse. Harvard Law and Policy Review, v. 273, 2012.

BALDWIN, Robert; CAVE, Martin; LODGE, Martin. The Oxford handbook of regulation. [s.l.]: Oxford University Press, 2010.

BALKIN, Jack M. Virtual liberty: freedom to design and freedom to play in virtual worlds. Virginia Law Review, 2004. Disponível em: < https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https ://scholar.google.com.br/&httpsredir=1&article=1238&context=fss_papers>.

BAMBERGER, Kenneth A.; MULLIGAN, Deirdre K. Privacy on the books and on the ground. Stanford Law Review, v. 63, p. 247, 2010.

BARIFOUSE, Rafael. Mais da metade das capitais brasileiras já têm projetos de lei contra o Uber. BBC Brasil. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 27 out. 2015.

BARLOW, John Perry. The next economy of ideas: selling wine without bottles on the global net. Wired, v. 8, 2000.

BAROCAS, Solon; HOOD, Sophie; ZIEWITZ, Malte. Governing algorithms: a provocation piece. 2013. Disponível em: < https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2245322> .

BAUMAN, Zygmunt. Modernidade líquida. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2001.

BAUMAN, Zygmunt. Vigilância líquida: diálogos com David Lyon. Trad. Carlos Alberto Medeiros. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2013.

BBC NEWS. North Korea: on the net in world’s most secretive nation. BBC. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 7 fev. 2019.

BEÇAK, Rubens; LONGHI, João Victor Rozatti. O papel das tecnologias de comunicação em manifestações populares: a “Primavera Árabe” e as “Jornadas de Junho” no Brasil. Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM, v. 10, n. 1, p. 388-405, 2015.

BELLIA, Patricia L. Chasing bits across borders. University of Chicago Legal Forum, v. 35, 2001.

BELLIA, Patricia L.; SCHIFF BERMAN, Paul; POST, David G. Cyberlaw: problems of Policy and Jurisprudence in the information age. [s.l.]: West Group, 2003.

BENKLER, Yochai. Constitutional bounds of database protection: the role of judicial review in the creation and definition of private rights in information. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, v. 15, p. 535-603, 2000. (2).

BENKLER, Yochai. Freedom in the commons: towards a political economy of information. Duke LJ, v. 52, p. 1245, 2002.

BENKLER, Yochai. Net regulation: taking stock and looking backward. University of Colorado Law Review, v. 71, p. 1203, 2000.

BENKLER, Yochai. Sharing nicely: on shareable goods and the emergence of sharing as a modality of economic production. Yale Law Journal, p. 273-358, 2004.

BENKLER, Yochai. The penguin and the leviathan: how cooperation triumphs over self-interest. [s.l.]: Crown Business, 2011.

BENKLER, Yochai. The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006.

BENKLER, Yochai; NISSENBAUM, Helen. Commons-based peer production and virtue. Journal of Political Philosophy, v. 14, n. 4, p. 394-419, 2006.

BENNETT, Colin J. Regulating privacy: data protection and public policy in Europe and the United States. [s.l.]: Cornell University Press, 1992.

BENNETT, Colin J. The governance of privacy: policy instruments in global perspective. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2006.

BENOLIEL, Daniel. Technological Standards, Inc.: rethinking cyberspace regulatory epistemology. California Law Review, v. 92, p. 0, 2004.

BENTHAM, Jeremy. O panóptico. [s.l.]: Autêntica, 2013.

BERKELEY, John. Reinventing the company. The Economist, 2015. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 28 out. 2015.

BERNAL, Paul. Internet Privacy Rights: rights to protect autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

BERNAL, Paul A. Web 2.5: the symbiotic web. Review of Law, Computers & Technology, v. 24, n. 1, 2010.

BERNAL, Paul Alexander. A right to delete? European Journal of Law and Technology, v. 2, n. 2, 2011. Disponível em: < http://ejlt.org/article/view/75/144> . Acesso em: 17 dez. 2015.

BERNERS-LEE, Tim. WWW: past, present, and future. Computer, v. 29, n. 10, p. 69-77, 1996.

BIONI, Bruno Ricardo. Proteção de dados pessoais: a função e os limites do consentimento. São Paulo: Forense, 2019.

BLACK, Ian; EDITOR, Middle East. Saudia Arabia leads Arab regimes in internet censorship. The Guardian, 2009. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 7 fev. 2019.

BLACK, Julia. Constitutionalising self‐regulation. The Modern Law Review, v. 59, n. 1, 1996.

BOMSE, Amy Lynne. The dependence of cyberspace. Duke Law Journal, v. 50, p. 1717-1749, 2000.

BORGESIUS, Frederik J. Zuiderveen. Personal data processing for behavioural targeting: which legal basis? International Data Privacy Law, v. 5, n. 3, p. 163, 2015.

BROWNSWORD, Roger. Code, control, and choice: why East is East and West is West. Legal Studies, v. 25, n. 1, p. 1-21, 2005.

BURN-CALLANDER, Rebecca. The robot chef coming to a kitchen near you. The Telegraph. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 7 fev. 2019.

BYGRAVE, Lee A. Internet governance by contract. [s.l.]: Oxford University Press, 2015.

BYGRAVE, Lee A. The future of privacy law. European Data Protection Law Review, v. 2, 2016.

BYGRAVE, Lee A. The place of privacy in data protection law. UNSWLJ, v. 24, p. 277, 2001.

BYGRAVE, Lee A.; BING, Jon. Internet governance: infrastructure and institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

CALO, Ryan; ROSENBLAT, Alex. The taking economy: Uber, information, and power. Columbia Law Review, v. 117, p. 1623-1690, 2017.

CANADA, Office of the Privacy Commissioner of. Guidelines for processing personal data across borders. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 3 mar. 2019.

CANADA, Office of the Privacy Commissioner of. Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 3 mar. 2019.

CANNATACI, Joseph A.; BONNICI, Jeanne Pia Mifsud. Can self-regulation satisfy the transnational requisite of successful Internet regulation? International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, v. 17, n. 1, p. 51-61, 2003.

CASTELLS, Manuel. A galáxia internet: reflexões sobre a internet, negócios e a sociedade. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2003. Disponível em: < https://books.google.com.br/books?hl=pt-BR&lr=&id=nCKFFmWOnNYC&oi=fnd&pg=PA5&dq=manuel +castells&ots=_CDORHz8ZP&sig=uEi4F8wSSNdLzVbgR31CJmRIKBk>. Acesso em: 14 dez. 2015.

CASTELLS, Manuel. Communication power. Oxford: OUP Oxford, 2013. Disponível em: < https://books.google.com.br/books?hl=pt-BR&lr=&id=qYAxAAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&dq=manuel +castells+communication&ots=zqkBfuY_8C&sig=LJXJSQCzROjRLrO_sXOc6FVkp3k>. Acesso em: 14 dez. 2015.

CASTELLS, Manuel. The rise of the network society: the information age. Economy, society, and culture. London: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.

CAVOUKIAN, Ann. Privacy by design: The 7 foundational principles. Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, Canada, v. 5, 2009.

CAVOUKIAN, Ann; HAMILTON, Tyler J. The privacy payoff: how successful businesses build customer trust. [s.l.]: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2002.

Chapter B: Key concepts - consent. Disponível em: https://www.oaic.gov.au/privacy/australian-privacy-principles-guidelines/chapterbkey-concepts/ >. Acesso em: 3 mar. 2019.

CLARK, Sam. Apple confirms russian local data storage. Global Data Review. Disponível em: < https://globaldatareview.com/article/1180120/apple-confirms-russian-local-data-storage> . Acesso em: 8 fev. 2019.

CNIL. None of your business and La Quadrature du Net vs. Google. CNIL. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 9 fev. 2019.

COHEN, Julie E. Cyberspace as/and Space. Columbia Law Review, v. 107, p. 210, 2007.

COHN, Cindy. John Perry Barlow, Internet Pioneer, 1947-2018. Electronic Frontier Foundation. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 7 fev. 2019.

CONSELHO NACIONAL DE JUSTIÇA. CNJ premia Mercado Livre por conciliar conflitos antes do processo judicial. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 9 fev. 2019.

CORTESE, Amy. Loans that avoid banks? Maybe not. The New York Times, 2014. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 2 ago. 2015.

CROSS BORDER PRIVACY RULES SYSTEM Accountability agents. Disponível em: < http://cbprs.org/accountability-agents/> . Acesso em: 3 mar. 2019.

DABROWSKI, Marek; JANIKOWSKI, Lukasz. Virtual currencies and central banks monetary policy: challenges ahead. Belgica: European Parliament’s Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, 2018.

DENARDIS, Laura. Internet points of control as global governance. Internet Governance Papers, v. 2, 2013. (Centre for International Governance Innovation). Disponível em: . Acesso em: 7 fev. 2019.

DENARDIS, Laura. The global war for internet governance. [s.l.]: Yale University Press, 2014.

DEUTSCHE WELLE. Post-Arab Spring censorship on the rise. DW.COM. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 7 fev. 2019.

DONEDA, Danilo. Da privacidade à proteção de dados pessoais. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2006. Disponível em: < http://egov.ufsc.br/portal/sites/default/files/anexos/29536-29552-1-PB.pdf> . Acesso em: 14 dez. 2015.

DOVI, Suzanne. Political representation. In: ZALTA, Edward N. (Org.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring [s.l.: s.n.], 2014. Disponível em: < http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/political-representation/> . Acesso em: 9 out. 2015.

DUHIGG, Charles. How companies learn your secrets. The New York Times, 2012. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 28 out. 2015.

EASTERBROOK, Frank H. Cyberspace and the Law of the Horse. University of Chicago Legal Forum, p. 207, 1996.

EHRLICH, Eugen. Fundamentos da sociologia do direito. [s.l.]: Universidade de Brasília, 1967.

EHRLICH, Eugen. O estudo do direito vivo. Sociologia e Direito, São Paulo, Pioneira Democracia: ideas y prácticas, 1980.

ELERT, Niklas; HENREKSON, Magnus. Evasive entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, v. 47, n. 1, p. 95-113, 2016.

EPSTEIN, Dmitry; KATZENBACH, Christian; MUSIANI, Francesca. Doing internet governance: practices, controversies, infrastructures, and institutions. Internet Policy Review, v. 5, n. 3, 2016. Disponível em: < https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/doing-internet-governance-practices-controversies-infrastructures-and-institutions> . Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.

EPSTEIN, Richard A. Can technological innovation survive government regulation. Harvard Journal Law & Public Policy, v. 36, p. 87, 2013.

ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMÉRICA. Riley v. California. Disponível em: .

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. What does data protection "by design" and "by default" mean? Disponível em: < https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/reform/rules-business-and-organisations/obligations/what-does-data-protection-design-and-default-mean_en> . Acesso em: 17 fev. 2019.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Adequacy of the protection of personal data in non-EU countries. Disponível em: < https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/data-transfers-outside-eu/adequacy-protection-personal-data-non-eu-countries_en> . Acesso em: 9 fev. 2019.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González. Disponível em: < https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62012CJ0131> . Acesso em: 12 fev. 2019.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. International data flows: commission launches the adoption of its adequacy decision on Japan. Disponível em: < http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-5433_en.htm> . Acesso em: 9 fev. 2019.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Reform of the data protection legal framework in the EU. Disponível em: < http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/reform/index_en.htm> . Acesso em: 18 dez. 2015.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Regulation on promoting fairness and transparency for business users of online intermediation services. Digital Single Market – European Commission. Disponível em: < https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/regulation-promoting-fairness-and-transparency-business-users-online-intermediation-services> . Acesso em: 12 fev. 2019.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Transatlantic data flows: restoring trust through strong safeguards. Bruxelas: European Commission, 2016. Disponível em: < https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX :52016DC0117&from=EN>. Acesso em: 18 fev. 2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE. Decision amending decision 2001/497/EC as regards the introduction of an alternative set of standard contractual clauses for the transfer of personal data to third countries. Disponível em: < https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32004D0915> .

EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE. Decision on standard contractual clauses for the transfer of personal data to processors established in third countries under Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Disponível em: < https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32010D0087> .

EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE. Decision on standard contractual clauses for the transfer of personal data to third countries. Disponível em: < https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX :32001D0497>.

EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE. Maximillian Schrems v. Data Protection Comissioner (Case 362/2014). Disponível em: < http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=169195&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=617315> . Acesso em: 28 out. 2015.

EVANS, David S.; SCHMALENSEE, Richard. Matchmakers: the new economics of multisided platforms. Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press Review, 2016.

FARRANHA, Ana Claudia. Estado, sociedade e interações digitais: expectativas democráticas. RP3-Revista de Pesquisa em Políticas Públicas, n. 2, 2014. Disponível em: < http://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/rp3/article/download/10158/7468> . Acesso em: 14 dez. 2015.

FARRANHA, Ana Claudia; DOS SANTOS, Leonardo Tadeu. Administração pública, direito e redes sociais: o caso da CGU no Facebook. Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM, v. 10, n. 2, p. 742-767, 2015.

FEDERAL TRADE COMISISON. Protecting consumer privacy in an era of rapid change: recommendations for businesses and policymakers. Federal Trade Commission. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 3 mar. 2019.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Internet of things: privacy & security in a connected world. Washington: FTC, 2015. Disponível em: .

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. A brief overview of the Federal Trade Commission's Investigative, Law Enforcement, and Rulemaking Authority. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 1 mar. 2019.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Protecting children’s privacy under COPPA: a survey on compliance. Estados Unidos: FTC, 2002. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 7 fev. 2019.

FILGUEIRAS, Fernando. Além da transparência: accountability e política da publicidade. Lua Nova, v. 84, p. 65-94, 2011.

FINCK, Michèle. Digital co-regulation: designing a supranational legal framework for the platform economy. European Law Review, 2018. Disponível em: < https://ssrn.com/abstract=2990043> .

FLYVERBOM, Mikkel. The power of networks: organizing the global politics of the internet. [s.l.]: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011. Disponível em: < https://books.google.com.br/books?hl=pt-BR&lr=&id=yHpxUYsaiYYC&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=mikkel +flyverbom&ots=VaGN-Urunx&sig=NoAbgHQ4DMWITO2q0u4SavIkZC0>.

FORTES, Vinícius Borges. Os direitos de privacidade e a de dados pessoais na internet. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2016.

FRAZÃO, Ana de Oliveira. Plataformas digitais e os desafios para a regulação jurídica. In: PARENTONI, Leonardo; GONTIJO, Bruno Miranda; LIMA, Henrique Cunha Souza (Orgs.). Direito, tecnologia e inovação. Belo Horizonte: D’Plácido, 2018. v. I.

FREUND, Paul Abraham. Privacy: one concept or many. [s.l.]: Atherton Press, 1971.

FRIED, Charles. Privacy: economics and ethics. A comment on Posner. Georgia Law Review, v. 12, p. 423, 1977.

FRYDMAN, Benoît; DE SCHUTTER, B.; PAS, J. Coregulation: a possible model for global governance. In: About globalisation: views on the trajectory of mondialisation, 2004.

GALGANO, Francesco. The new Lex Mercatoria. Annual Survery of Internaional & Comparative Law, v. 2, p. 99, 1995.

GAVISON, Ruth. Privacy and the limits of law. The Yale Law Journal, v. 89, n. 3, p. 421-471, 1980.

GLOBALPOST. Here’s everywhere Uber is banned around the world. Business Insider. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 7 fev. 2019.

GREENBERG, Andy. Mapping how Tor’s anonymity network spread around the world. Wired UK, n. Online, 2015. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 27 out. 2015.

GREENBERG, Andy. The Senate’s Draft Encryption Bill Is ‘Ludicrous, Dangerous, Technically Illiterate’’’. Wired, 2016. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 7 fev. 2019.

GREENBERG, Andy. It’s Been 20 Years Since This Man Declared Cyberspace Independence. Wired. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 7 fev. 2019.

GROSS, Hyman. The concept of privacy. New York University Law Review, v. 42, 1967.

GROSSI, Paolo. O ponto e a linha. História do Direito e Direito Positivo na formação jurista do nosso tempo. Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos, v. 26, n. 51, p. 31-46, 2005.

GUIMARÃES JÚNIOR, Mário J. L. De pés descalços no ciberespaço: tecnologia e cultura no cotidiano de um grupo social on-line. Horizontes Antropológicos, v. 10, n. 21, p. 123-154, 2004.

GÜRSES, Seda; TRONCOSO, Carmela; DIAZ, Claudia. Engineering privacy by design. Computers, Privacy & Data Protection, v. 14, n. 3, p. 25, 2011.

GUTWIRTH, Serge; DE HERT, Paul. Regulating profiling in a democratic constitutional state. In: Profiling the European citizen. London: Springer, p. 271-302, 2008. Disponível em: < http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-6914-7_14> . Acesso em: 16 dez. 2015.

HILDEBRANDT, Mireille. Legal and technological normativity: more (and less) than twin sisters. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, v. 12, n. 3, p. 169-183, 2008.

HIRSHLEIFER, Jack. Privacy: Its origin, function, and future. The Journal of Legal Studies, v. 9, n. 4, p. 649-664, 1980.

HUNTER, Dan. Cyberspace as Place and the Tragedy of the Digital Anticommons. California Law Review, v. 91, p. 439, 2003.

IBGE. PNAD contínua: acesso à internet e à televisão e posse de telefone móvel celular para uso pessoal. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2018. (PNAD Contínua). Disponível em: < https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/media/com_mediaibge/arquivos/c62c9d551093e4b8e9d9810a6d3bafff.pdf> . Acesso em: 7 fev. 2019.

ICO. Aggregate IQ Data Services Ltd. Disponível em: < https://icoumbraco.azurewebsites.net/action-weve-taken/enforcement/aggregate-iq-data-services-ltd/> . Acesso em: 9 fev. 2019.

JAY, Rosemary; MALCOLM, William; PARRY, Ellis; et al. Guide to the General Data Protection Regulation. [s.l.]: Sweet & Maxwell, 2017.

JOERGES, Christian; SAND, Inger-Johanne; TEUBNER, Gunther. Transnational governance and constitutionalism. Portland: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2004. Disponível em: < https://books.google.com.br/books?hl=pt-BR&lr=&id=27zbBAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=teubner +transnational+governance&ots=vB3PvPnHKc&sig=ywWb1Ku0blYXORsTdMkvxBcl5uk>. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2015.

JOHNSON, David R.; POST, David. Law and borders: the rise of law in cyberspace. Stanford Law Review, v. 48, p. 1367, 1995.

JONAS, Hans. O princípio responsabilidade: ensaio de uma ética para a civilização tecnológica. [s.l.]: Contraponto, 2006.

JONES, Jacqueline. France top court rules surveillance law constitutional. Jurist. Disponível em: < http://jurist.org/paperchase/2015/07/france-top-court-rules-surveillance-law-constitutional.php> . Acesso em: 1 ago. 2015.

JSTOR. Evidence in United States vs. Aaron Swartz. 2013. Disponível em: < http://docs.jstor.org/> . Acesso em: 8 fev. 2019.

JUENGER, Friedrich K. The Lex Mercatoria and private international law. Louisiana Law Review, v. 60, p. 1133, 1999.

JUNGBLUT, Airton Luiz. A heterogenia do mundo on-line: algumas reflexões sobre virtualização, comunicação mediada por computador e ciberespaço. Horizontes Antropológicos, v. 10, n. 21, p. 97-121, 2004.

KATZ, Jonathan; MENEZES, Alfred J.; VAN OORSCHOT, Paul C.; et al. Handbook of applied cryptography. [s.l.]: CRC Press, 1996.

KERR, Orin S. The problem of perspective in internet law. Georgetown Law Journal, v. 91, p. 357, 2002.

KIVIAT, Trevor I. Beyond bitcoin: issues in regulating blockchain tranactions. Duke LJ, v. 65, p. 569, 2015.

KLEROS. The Blockchain Dispute Resolution Layer. Disponível em: < https://kleros.io/> . Acesso em: 12 fev. 2019.

KUNER, Christopher. Extraterritoriality and regulation of international data transfers in EU data protection law. International Data Privacy Law, v. 5, n. 4, 2015.

KUNER, Christopher. Transborder data flow regulation and data privacy law. [s.l.]: Oxford University Press Oxford, 2013.

LADEUR, Karl. ICANN and the illusion of a community-based internet: comments on Jochen von Bersstorff. In: JOERGES, Christian; TEUBNER, Gunther (Orgs.). Transnational governance and constitutionalism. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004.

LASTOWKA, Gregory F.; HUNTER, Dan. The laws of the virtual worlds. California Law Review, v. 92, 2004. Disponível em: < https://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https ://scholar.google.com.br/&httpsredir=1&article=1345&context=californialawreview>.

LATOUR, Bruno. Reagregando o social: uma introdução à teoria do ator-rede. [s.l.]: Edusc, 2012.

LEGRAND, Pierre. The impossibility of legal transplants. Maastricht Journal of European & Comparative Law, v. 4, p. 111, 1997.

LEMLEY, Mark A. Place and cyberspace. California Law Review, v. 91, n. 2, p. 521-542, 2003.

LEONARDI, Marcel. Tutela e privacidade na internet. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2012.

LERNER, Zach. A warrant to hack: an analysis of the proposed amendments to rule 41 of the federal ruled of criminal procedure. Yale Journal of Law & Technology, v. 18, p. 26, 2016.

LESSIG, Lawrence. Code version 2.0 and other laws of cyberspace. New York: Basic Books, 2006.

LEVIN, Dan. At U.N., China tries to influence fight over internet control. The New York Times, 2017. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 7 fev. 2019.

LÉVY, Pierre. Cibercultura. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2010. Disponível em: < https://books.google.com.br/books?hl=pt-BR&lr=&id=7L29Np0d2YcC&oi=fnd&pg=PA11&dq=pierre +levy&ots=giUuzyZujo&sig=XPSznoFZ2rb4tO5ELVa5j14f150>. Acesso em: 17 dez. 2015.

LOWY, Michael. As aventuras de Marx contra o Barão de Munchhausen. São Paulo: Busca Vida, 1987.

LUHMANN, Niklas. Introduction to systems theory. Trad. Peter Gilgen. Malden: Polity, 2013.

LYNSKEY, Orla. The foundations of EU Data Protection Law. 1 edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.

LYOTARD, Jean-François. A condição pós-moderna. Trad. Ricardo Corrêa Barbosa. Rio de Janeiro: José Olympio, 2004.

MAGRANI, Eduardo. A internet das coisas. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 2018.

MAGRANI, Eduardo. Threats of the internet of things in a techno-regulated society: a new legal challenge of the information revolution. International Journal of Private Law, v. 9, n. 1-2, p. 4-18, 2018.

MARAS, Marie-Helen. Internet of things: security and privacy implications. International Data Privacy Law, v. 5, n. 2, 2015.

MAROTTA-WURGLER, Florencia. What’s in a standard form contract? An empirical analysis of software license agreements. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, v. 4, n. 4, p. 677-713, 2007.

MAST, Tobias; OERMANN, Markus; SCHULZ, Wolfgang. Doing internet governance: constructing normative structures inside and outside of intermediary organisations. In: Annual Symposium 2016. Washington: [s.n.], 2016. Disponível em: < https://ssrn.com/abstract=2909367> .

MATTEI, Ugo. Efficiency in legal transplants: an essay in comparative law and economics. International Review of Law and Economics, v. 14, p. 3-19, 1994.

MAYER-SCHÖNBERGER, Viktor. Delete: the virtue of forgetting in the digital age. New York: Princeton University Press, 2011. Disponível em: < https://books.google.com.br/books?hl=pt-BR&lr=&id=ZrqvYOBm_sMC&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&dq=viktor +mayer&ots=6obyU4xJfS&sig=8sKW5ZezOEp8WUte_D2Ai0hZJsw>. Acesso em: 11 dez. 2015.

MAYER-SCHÖNBERGER, Viktor. Demystifying Lessig. Wisconsin Law Review, p. 713, 2008.

MAYER-SCHÖNBERGER, Viktor. The shape of governance: analyzing the world of internet regulation. Virginia Journal of International Law, v. 43, p. 605, 2002.

MAYER-SCHÖNBERGER, Viktor. Virtual heisenberg: the limits of virtual world regulability. Washington & Lee Law Review, v. 66, 2009.

MENDES, Laura Schertel; DONEDA, Danilo. Marco jurídico para a cidadania digital: uma análise do Projeto de Lei 5.276/2016. Revista de Direito Civil Contemporâneo-RDCC (Journal of Contemporary Private Law), v. 9, p. 35-48, 2017.

MILLER, Arthur Raphael. The assault on privacy: computers, data banks, and dossiers. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1971.

MITTEN, Christopher. Shawn Fanning: Napster and the music revolution. New York: Twenty-First Century Books, 2002.

MONTEIRO, Fábio. Governo estuda taxar aluguel informal de imóveis, cômodos ou mesmo sofás. Folha de São Paulo. 2015. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 7 fev. 2019.

MONTEIRO, Silvana Drumond; PICKLER, Maria Elisa Valentim. O ciberespaço: o termo, a definição e o conceito. DataGramaZero-Revista de Ciência da Informação, v. 8, n. 3, p. 1-21, 2007.

MUOIO, Daniele. The world's first robot kitchen is coming. Business Insider. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 7 fev. 2019.

MURRAY, Andrew. The regulation of cyberspace: control in the online environment. London: Routledge, 2007.

MURRAY, Andrew D. Information technology law: the law and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

MURRAY, Andrew D. Nodes and gravity in virtual space. Legisprudence, v. 5, n. 2, p. 195-221, 2011.

MURRAY, Andrew D. Regulation and rights in networked space. Journal of Law and Society, v. 30, n. 2, p. 187-216, 2003.

MURRAY, Andrew D.; SCOTT, Colin. Controlling the new media: hybrid responses to new forms of power. The Modern Law Review, v. 65, n. 4, p. 491-516, 2002.

MUSTILL, Justice. The new: the first twenty-five years. Arbitration International, v. 4, n. 2, p. 86-119, 1988.

NETANEL, Neil Weinstock. Cyberspace self-governance: a skeptical view from Liberal Democratic theory. California Law Review, v. 88, p. 395, 2000.

NEVES, Marcelo da Costa Pinto. Transconstitucionalismo. 3. ed. São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes, 2013.

NISSENBAUM, Helen. Privacy in context: technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. New York: Stanford University Press, 2009. Disponível em: < https://books.google.com.br/books?hl=pt-BR&lr=&id=_NN1uGn1Jd8C&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=helen +nissenbaum&ots=_K5rYnf4CU&sig=yTWZHt7i0IMFSO6rTrx1V1zpuEM>. Acesso em: 28 out. 2015.

OHM, Paul. Branding privacy. Minnesota Law Review, v. 97, p. 907, 2012.

OHM, Paul. Broken promises of privacy: responding to the surprising failure of anonymization. UCLA Law Review, v. 57, 2009. Disponível em: < https://pages.uoregon.edu/koopman/courses_readings/phil407-net/ohm_broken_promises_privacy.pdf> .

O’NEIL, Cathy. Weapons of math destruction: how big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. [s.l.]: Broadway Books, 2017.

OYEZ. Reno v. ACLU. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 7 fev. 2019.

PAAR, Christof; PELZL, Jan. Understanding cryptography: a textbook for students and practitioners. [s.l.]: Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.

PASQUALE, Frank. The Black Box Society. Harvard University Press, v. 36, p. 32, 2015.

PERLINGIEIRI, Pietro (Org.). Manuale di diritto civile. 6. ed. Napoli: Edizione Scientifiche Italiane, 2007.

PERRITT JR., Henry H. Jurisdiction in cyberspace. Villanova Law Review, v. 41, p. 1, 1996.

PETERSON, Andrea. Could hackers take down a city? The Washington Post, Online 2015. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 27 out. 2015.

PLAUTZ, Jason Abbruzzese and Jessica. New York goes to war against Airbnb for disrupting hotel business. Mashable. Disponível em: < https://mashable.com/2014/04/26/new-york-vs-airbnb/> . Acesso em: 7 fev. 2019.

POSNER, Richard. Do patent and copyright law restrict competition and creativity excessively? The Becker-Posner Blog. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 1 nov. 2015.

POSNER, Richard. The economics of privacy. The American Economic Review, v. 71, n. 2, 1981.

POST, David G. What Larry doesn’t get: code, law, and liberty in cyberspace. Stanford Law Review, v. 52, n. 5, p. 1439-1459, 2000.

PRESSE, Da France. Uber tem vitória na Suprema Corte da Inglaterra e do País de Gales. Tem um aplicativo – G1. Disponível em: < http://g1.globo.com/tecnologia/tem-um-aplicativo/noticia/2015/10/uber-tem-vitoria-na-suprema-corte-da-inglaterraedo-pais-de-gales.html> . Acesso em: 7 fev. 2019.

PRIVACY SHIELD. Program Overview. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 3 mar. 2019.

PRZEWORSKI, Adam; STOKES, Susan C.; MANIN, Bernand. Democracy, accountability, and representation. London: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

QASIR, Sophia. Anonymity in cyberspace: judicial and legislative regulations. Fordham Law Review, v. 81, p. 3651, 2012.

RANCHORDÁS, Sofia. Does sharing mean caring: regulating innovation in the sharing economy. Minnesota Journal of Law, Sciense & Technology, v. 16, 2015. Disponível em: < https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1356&context=mjlst> .

REIDENBERG, Joel R. Lex Informatica: the formulation of information policy rules through technology. Texas Law Review, v. 76, p. 553, 1997.

REIDENBERG, Joel R. Technology and internet jurisdiction. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, p. 1951-1974, 2005.

RICE, Eric. The second amendment and the struggle over cryptography. Hastings Science and Technology Law Journal, v. 9, p. 29, 2017.

RIDLEY, Matt. The myth of basic science. Wall Street Journal, Online 2015. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 28 out. 2015.

RODOTÀ, Stefano. A vida na sociedade da vigilância: a privacidade hoje. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2008.

RODOTÀ, Stefano. Tecnologie e diritti. [s.l.]: Il mulino, 1995.

ROSS, Patrick Ian. Bernstein v. United States Department of State. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, v. 13, p. 405, 1998.

RUBINSTEIN, Ira. Regulating privacy by design. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, v. 26, p. 1409, 2012 . Disponível em: < http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1837862> . Acesso em: 13 dez. 2015.

RUNDLE, Michael. Matt Hancock’s smartphone state, via Uber and blockchain. Wired UK, 2015. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 7 fev. 2019.

SAMUELSON, Pamela. A new kind of privacy – regulating uses of personal data in the global information economy. California Law Review, v. 87, 1999.

SAMUELSON, Pamela. Privacy as intellectual property. Stanford Law Review, v. 52, p. 1125-1173, 2000.

SCHAAR, Peter. Privacy by design. Identity in the Information Society, v. 3, n. 2, p. 267-274, 2010.

SCHOR, Juliet. Debating the sharing economy. Journal of Self-Governance & Management Economics, v. 4, n. 3, 2016.

SCHOR, Juliet B.; FITZMAURICE, Connor J. Collaborating and connecting: the emergence of the sharing economy. Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption, v. 410, 2015.

SCHWARTZ, Paul M. Legal access to the global cloud. Columbia Law Review, v. 118, n. 6, p. 1681-1762, 2018.

SCHWARTZ, Paul M. Privacy and democracy in cyberspace. Vanderbilt Law Review, v. 52, 1999.

SCHWARTZ, Paul M.; SOLOVE, Daniel J. The PII problem: privacy and a new concept of personally identifiable information. NYU Law Review, v. 86, p. 1814, 2011.

SCOTT, Colin. Accountability in the Regulatory State. Journal of Law and Society, v. 27, n. 1, p. 38-60, 2000.

SCOTT, Colin. Regulation in the age of governance: the rise of the post regulatory state. [s.l.]: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2004. Disponível em: < https://books.google.com.br/books?hl=pt-BR&lr=&id=1TmMDMIDgj8C&oi=fnd&pg=PA145&dq=colin +scott+regulation&ots=XcBXbCDdcG&sig=aPiWwTmci6N_XfoutFoVpuIY3w8>.

SHAH, Reema. Law enforcement and data privacy: a forward-looking approach. Yale Law Journal, v. 125, p. 543, 2015.

SIMPSON, Kevin. How a cyberbullying law in Colorado was tweaked to be more effective. Denver Post, Online 2015. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 4 ago. 2015.

SMITH, Henry E. Property as the law of things. Harvard Law Review, v. 125, n. 7, 2012. Disponível em: .

SOLOVE, Daniel J. Understanding privacy. Harvard University Press, 2008.

SOLOVE, Daniel J.; HOOFNAGLE, C. J. A model regime of privacy protection 2.0. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015. Disponível em: < http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=881294> . Acesso em: 11 dez. 2015.

SOLOVE, Daniel J.; ROTENBERG, Marc; SCHWARTZ, Paul M. Information privacy law. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law Business, 2014. Disponível em: < http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/dsolove/information-privacy-law/files/ipl-update-2007.pdf> . Acesso em: 13 dez. 2015.

STONE SWEET, Alec. The new Lex Mercatoria and transnational governance. Journal of European Public Policy, v. 13, n. 5, p. 627-646, 2006.

SUNDARARAJAN, Arun. The sharing economy: the end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. [s.l.]: The MIT Press, 2016.

SUNDARARAJAN, Arun. Why the government doesn’t need to regulate the sharing economy. WIRED. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 9 abr. 2016.

SUNSTEIN, Cass. Republic.com 2.0. 2. ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.

SUNSTEIN, Cass R. A Constitution of many minds. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2009.

SUPERIOR TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA. Recurso Especial 1.348.532/SP . Disponível em: . Acesso em: 18 fev. 2019.

SWEET, Alec Stone. The new Lex Mercatoria and transnational governance. Journal of European Public Policy, v. 13, n. 5, p. 627-646, 2006.

SWIRE, Peter P.; AHMAD, Kenesa. US private-sector privacy: law and practice for information privacy professionals. [s.l.]: International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP), 2012.

SWIRE, Peter P.; AHMAD, Kenesa; MCQUAY, Terry. Foundations of information privacy and data protection: a survey of global concepts, laws and practices. [s.l.]: International Association of Privacy Professionals, 2012.

TAMANAHA, Brian Z.; SAGE, Caroline; WOOLCOCK, Michael. Legal pluralism and development: scholars and practitioners in dialogue. New Haven: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

TAURION, CEZAR. O papel do DevOps como alicerce da próxima revolução tecnológica. Computerworld. Disponível em: < https://computerworld.com.br/2016/09/16/devops-seraoalicerce-da-proxima-revolucao-tecnologica/> . Acesso em: 8 fev. 2019.

TAYLOR, Josh. France drops Hadopi three-strikes copyright law. ZDNet. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 2 abr. 2016.

TAYLOR, Josh. Rights holders could get sites blocked without evidence. ZDNet. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 2 ago. 2015.

TECHOPEDIA. Identifier for Advertisers (IFA/IFDA): definition. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 19 fev. 2019.

TEMPERTON, James; BURGESS, Matt. Net neutrality: european parliament votes in favour of “two speed” internet. Wired UK. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 28 out. 2015.

TENE, Omer; POLONETSKY, Jules. A theory of creepy: technology, privacy and shifting social norms. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, v. 16, 2013. Disponível em: < https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/yjolt16&div=3&id=&page=> . Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.

TEUBNER, Gunther. A Bukowina global sobre a emergência de um pluralismo jurídico transnacional. Impulso: Revista de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, v. 14, n. 33, p. 9-31, 2003.

TEUBNER, Gunther. Breaking frames: economic globalization and the emergence of Lex Mercatoria. European Journal of Social Theory, v. 5, n. 2, p. 199-217, 2002.

TEUBNER, Gunther. Constitutional fragments: societal constitutionalism and globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Disponível em: < https://books.google.com.br/books?hl=pt-BR&lr=&id=kKDK5w5UJdMC&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&dq=teubner +constitutional&ots=fFyE0OGkd8&sig=kiWR82yAKYfBQzb9MYwucGf7Vjs>. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2015.

TEUBNER, Gunther. Direito, sistema e policontexturalidade. Piracicaba: Unimep, 2005.

TEUBNER, Gunther. Fragmentos constitucionais: constitucionalismo social na globalização. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2016.

TEUBNER, Gunther. Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World-Society. Global Law Without State, p. 3-28, 1996. (Social Science Research Network).

TEUBNER, Gunther. Legal irritants: good faith in British law or how unifying law ends up in new divergencies. The Modern Law Review, v. 61, n. 1, p. 11-32, 1998.

TEUBNER, Gunther. Societal constitutionalism: alternatives to state-centered constitutional theory? In: JOERGES, Christian (Org.). Transnational governance and constitutionalism. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004.

THALER, Richard H. Behavioral economics: past, present, and future. American Economic Review, v. 106, n. 7, p. 1577-1600, 2016.

THALER, Richard H. Misbehaving: the making of behavioral economics. Nova York: WW Norton & Company, 2015.

THALER, Richard H.; SUNSTEIN, Cass R. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. [s.l.]: Penguin, 2009.

THALER, Richard H.; SUNSTEIN, Cass R.; BALZ, John P. Choice architecture. In: SHAFIR, Eldar (Ed.). The behavioral foundations of public policy, [s.l.: s.n.], 2014.

THE ECONOMIST. Data is giving rise to a new economy. The Economist. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 7 fev. 2019.

TIEGHI, Ana Luiza. Conexão wifi é caminho para loja conhecer cliente e direcionar vendas. Folha de São Paulo. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.

TURKLE, Sherry. Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. First Trade Paper Edition edition. New York: Basic Books, 2012.

TURKLE, Sherry. Cyberspace and identity. Contemporary Sociology, p. 643-648, 1999.

UNESCO. Human rights and encryption. [s.l.: s.n., s.d.]. Disponível em: < https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark :/48223/pf0000246527>. Acesso em: 3 mar. 2019.

UNITED States v. Graham. Harvard Law Review, v. 130, 2017. Disponível em: < https://harvardlawreview.org/2017/02/united-statesvgraham/> . Acesso em: 19 fev. 2019.

USTARAN, Eduardo. European privacy: law and practice for data protection professionals. Portsmouth, NH: International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP), 2012.

USTARAN, Eduardo. The future of privacy. London: Data Guidance, 2013. (Kindle). Disponível em: . Acesso em: 19 fev. 2019.

VELLOSO, Ricardo Vianna. O ciberespaço como ágora eletrônica na sociedade contemporânea. Ciência da Informação, Brasília, v. 37, n. 2, p. 103-109, 2008.

VENKATADRI, Giridhari; ANDREOU, Athanasios; LIU, Yabing; et al. Privacy risks with Facebook’s PII-based targeting: auditing a data broker’s advertising interface. In: Federal Trade Commission PrivacyCon. Washington: [s.n.], 2018. p. 221-239. Disponível em: < https://mislove.org/publications/PII-Oakland.pdf> .

VESTING, Thomas. Constitutionalism or legal theory: comments on Gunther Teubner. In: JOERGES, Christian; SAND, Inger-Johanne; TEUBNER, Gunther. Transnational governance and constitutionalism. Oxford: Hart, 2004.

VESTING, Thomas. Teoria do direito: uma introdução. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2015.

VIEHWEG, Theodor. Tópica e jurisprudência. Trad. Tércio Sampaio Ferraz Júnior. Brasília: UnB, 1979.

VOLPICELLI, Gian. Alex Pentland: big data will help us hold governments accountable. Wired UK. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 27 out. 2015.

VON JHERING, Rudolf. In the heaven for legal concepts: a fantasy. Temple Law Quarterly, v. 58, p. 799, 1985.

WALDMAN, Ari Ezra. Privacy, notice, and design. Stanford Technology Law Review, v. 21, p. 74, 2018.

WARREN, Samuel D.; BRANDEIS, Louis D. The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, p. 193-220, 1890.

WATSON, Alan. Legal transplants and European private law. [s.l.]: Metro Maastricht, 2000. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 9 dez. 2016.

WEBER, Max. Economia e sociedade: fundamentos da sociologia compreensiva. Brasília: UnB, 1999. v. 1.

WESTIN, Alan F. Privacy and freedom. 1970. Disponível em: < http://philpapers.org/rec/WESPAF-2> . Acesso em: 14 dez. 2015.

WICHOWSKI, Alexis. Facebook and Google are actually “Net States” and they rule the world. Wired. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 12 fev. 2019.

WILLIS, Lauren E. Why not privacy by default. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, v. 29, p. 61, 2014.

WOOLGAR, Steve; NEYLAND, Daniel. Mundane governance: ontology and accountability. Oxford: OUP Oxford, 2013.

WORKING PARTY 29. Explanatory document on the processor binding corporate rules. Bruxelas: WP29, 2013. Disponível em: < https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2013/wp204_en.pdf> .

WORKING PARTY 29. Opinion 1/2010 on the concepts of controller and processor. Bruxelas: [s.n.], 2010. Disponível em: < https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2010/wp169_en.pdf> .

WORKING PARTY 29. Opinion 3/2010 on the principle of accountability. Bruxelas: WP29, 2010. Disponível em: .

WORKING PARTY 29. Opinion 4/2007 on the concept of personal data. Bruxelas: [s.n.], 2007. Disponível em: < https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2007/wp136_en.pdf> .

WORKING PARTY 29. Opinion 5/2014 on anonymisation technques. Bruxelas: [s.n.], 2014. Disponível em: < https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2014/wp216_en.pdf> .

WORKING PARTY 29. Opinion 8/2014 on the on recent developments on the internet of things. Bruxelas: WP29, 2014. Disponível em: .

WORKING PARTY 29. Opinion on adequacy referential. Bruxelas: WP 29, 2018. Disponível em: < https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/item-detail.cfm?item_id=614108> . Acesso em: 9 fev. 2019.

WORKING PARTY 29. Opinion on Data Protection Officers (DPOs). Bruxelas: [s.n.], 2017. Disponível em: < https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/item-detail.cfm?item_id=612048> .

ZITTRAIN, Jonathan. Icann: between the public and the private comments before Congress. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, v. 14, p. 1071, 1999.

ZITTRAIN, Jonathan. The future of the internet–and how to stop it. [s.l.]: Yale University Press, 2008. Disponível em: < https://books.google.com.br/books?hl=pt-BR&lr=&id=NiATs-C6nlQC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=zittrain +jonathan&ots=Cv9wUJprkx&sig=_0WVC790L4l9Nioto0zePCyPLns>.

ZUBOFF, Shoshana. The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Nova York: Public Affairs, 2019.

Uma experiência inovadora de pesquisa jurídica em doutrina, a um clique e em um só lugar.

No Jusbrasil Doutrina você acessa o acervo da Revista dos Tribunais e busca rapidamente o conteúdo que precisa, dentro de cada obra.

  • 3 acessos grátis às seções de obras.
  • Busca por conteúdo dentro das obras.
Ilustração de computador e livro
jusbrasil.com.br
24 de Maio de 2022
Disponível em: https://thomsonreuters.jusbrasil.com.br/doutrina/secao/1201073428/bibliografia-fundamentos-da-regulacao-da-privacidade-e-protecao-de-dados-pessoais-ed-2020